A 24-criteria comparison between HaloPSA (standalone PSA) and SuperOps (combined PSA + RMM) — two of the fastest-growing platforms for growth-stage MSPs.
| Feature | HaloPSA | SuperOps |
|---|---|---|
| PSA (ticketing, billing) | ||
| RMM module | ||
| Project management | Basic | |
| Workflow automation | Deep | Moderate |
| API access | ||
| Client portal | ||
| Patch management | ||
| Remote access | ||
| Starting price | $79/user/mo | $59/user/mo |
| Onboarding time | 4-8 weeks | 2-4 weeks |
HaloPSA wins when you need the depth and flexibility of a dedicated PSA and are happy running a separate RMM. SuperOps wins when you want to consolidate PSA and RMM onto one platform, simplify your stack, and reduce per-tech tool costs. For MSPs under $3M who are starting fresh, SuperOps is often the cleaner choice. For MSPs who already have an RMM they're happy with, HaloPSA is the better standalone PSA.
Choose HaloPSA if you already have a preferred RMM (NinjaOne, ConnectWise Automate, Datto) and want the deepest possible PSA feature set without PSA/RMM bundling trade-offs.
Choose SuperOps if you're starting fresh or want to simplify your stack. The combined platform reduces vendor management overhead and the all-in per-user pricing is straightforward to margin.